Palocci out, Gov2.0 in: is Brazil changing?

Posted by By at 8 June, at 16 : 34 PM Print

Palocci out, Gov2.0 in: is Brazil changing?

The first thing I noticed this morning in the local press here in São Paulo was the news that president Dilma Rousseff had accepted the resignation of her chief of staff, Antonio Palocci.

It’s a corruption story. Nothing much to do with IT, but I tweeted the news nonetheless and I was surprised to see a very high amount of negativity expressed on Twitter regarding the removal of Palocci.

To recap, Palocci’s personal wealth increased twenty times during 2006-2010 thanks to his personal consulting firm, a period during which he has also been in office. There is nothing illegal about a politician running a private firm on the side – it happens in many countries and often allows elected officials to stay more in touch with the real world of commerce. However, such a rapid increase in wealth has sparked questions about exactly what consulting Palocci has been up to.

The responses I got on Twitter to my post can be summed up with a shrug of the shoulders… It’s just what we expect from politicians… They are all crooks… The system can never change…

But I would suggest that maybe President Dilma has kicked a snowball of transparency from the top of a very large mountain. It may take some time for it to start gathering speed, but there is already the momentum for change.

Today in São Paulo there is the first ever Brazilian Gov 2.0 event. This echos what countries such as the US, Canada, and UK have all tried – getting people to participate more effectively in modern politics. This Brazilian event follows the unconference format used at events such as barcamp and aims to bring politicians, companies, and organizations together to plan more effective methods of governance – especially with the use of technology.

The agenda for the conference was set by the interested parties debating what should be debated today on social networks over the past few weeks. Every aspect of the conference planning has been posted online to ensure that everything, from the agenda to the proposed speakers, was discussed openly before the event ever took place.

And one of the key messages about a more social style of government is that it is harder for the crooks to hide. From the chief of staff making millions on the side to a traffic policeman asking for bribes, once information about their activities is more freely available, transparency wins.

If this sounds idealistic then take a look at I Paid a Bribe – an Indian website. Once policemen, driving test examiners, immigration officials, and elected politicians start realising that the public will share information on their activities without fear of recrimination then graft becomes harder – at all levels.

Angelica Mari is reporting from the Gov 2.0 conference today so you will hear more about that event tomorrow, but IT Decisions wants to hear from you on this wider issue. Can technology really make a difference to the structure of government itself and start shining a light on the areas that other strategies have never reached?

Photo by the US Army licensed under Creative Commons

Comment Culture Economics News , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

3 Comments

  1. Gustavo, 1 year ago Reply

    I wonder if this type of change would happen if there wasn’t anything like the web available. I mean: with the internet – especially social medias – it’s really possible to spread the word and make some noise. Govnmt’s have little to do – basically some damage control (probably Palocci’s been forced to resign so he wouldn’t have to offer further explanations to the Senate – after his resignation, what once was a request for enquiry turned into a simple invitation for details, which he obviously declined).

    You probably didn’t hear much about a previous, much bigger scandal called “Mensalão do PT”. It was during Lula’s first term as President and it made his Civil House minister (José Dirceu) resign by then, followed by several big names from PT. Social media had very little influence by then and probably because of that, Lula could leave the incident pratically unharmed.

    • Mark Hillary, 1 year ago Reply

      Gustavo, I agree with you. It’s the free and open access to information that is forcing transparency. Just look at what is happening in north Africa and the Middle East. In those countries the people are campaigning for a voice – they can’t even complain about corruption.

  2. Brazil suffers its biggest cyber attack – yet | IT Decisions, 1 year ago Reply

    [...] and the president’s decision to sack him earlier this month, was received as the start of  a move towards transparency. Until it was discovered that the government is proposing to start blocking the release of archived [...]


Post Your Comment

Photo Gallery